The Progressive Party believes it was intercepted

[limited]

The Progressive Party believes it was intercepted by the Election Commission after the vote was swept up in the local election.










Ms. Pannikarvanich Executive Director, Faculty of Progress Citing the case where the Election Commission (Election Commission) passed a resolution setting up a committee to investigate the Progressive Committee to conduct activities like a political party, this is not the first time that intimidation and silence cases have been used. Every time we get hit like this It is a vision that he is assessing that we are successful. For example, this time it would be seen that there is a high chance that the Progressive Group will win local elections in many provinces Therefore leverage the original pearl to use For slower campaign performance Distract the public in voting
However, we insist that we cannot stop advancing campaigning in the 42 provinces we send candidates. Because today people want change And this litigation will only increase the public's attention to the campaign, which the Election Commission should thanks to the Progressive Party that has made people more alert to local elections. Especially for this allegation, while the Election Commission, in addition to the sign Seldom seen any other election publicity work


Ms. Pannikar said there were several groups of local elections sending candidates to compete. Because the regulations do not already specify that they must belong to a political party So the groups put them into the race, while the Progressive Corps was one of those that sent ทางเข้า slotxo candidates in many areas, which was okay. But if the regulations state that the political party must submit If not signed on behalf of a political party, he cannot apply. Then the Faculty of Progress, we do This is a behavior that is imitated as a political party. So how is it possible that there are many groups all over Thailand sent to them? Then only one progressive group was prosecuted. Which if you dare to do that Would like to know how people will view this matter


Ms. Pannikar said there were several groups of local elections sending candidates to compete. Because the regulations do not already specify that they must belong to a political party So the groups put them into the race, while the Progressive Corps was one of those that sent candidates in many areas, which was okay. But if the regulations state that the political party must submit If not signed on behalf of a political party, he cannot apply. Then the Faculty of Progress, we do This is a behavior that is imitated as a political party. So how is it possible that there are many groups all over Thailand sent to them? Then only one progressive group was prosecuted. Which if you dare to do that Would like to know how people will view this matter